Determining The Effects Of Different Treatments On The Flowering Of Sweet Cherry Trees And Fruit Quality

Authors

  • Deniz EROĞUL Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü
  • Canan YILMAZ Stoller Turkey Organik Tarım San. Tic. A.Ş. Kemalpaşa-İzmir
  • Fatih ŞEN Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss1pp40-47

Keywords:

Prunus avium L., earliness, fruit diameter, full bloom, foliar application

Abstract

Earliness is also very important in addition to yield and fruit quality for more profitable production in sweet cherry cultivation. Therefore, some preparats are applied to get flowering even earlier in Kemalpaşa District of Izmir province, where sweet cherry fruits from Turkey are harvested the earliest. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of different treatments in the pre-flowering period on flowering and fruit quality of sweet cherry fruits. The study was carried out in the 2018 production year in a sweet cherry orchard established with the "0900 Ziraat" (Prunus avium L.) variety grafted on the "idris" (Prunus mahaleb) rootstock belonging to a producer in Kemalpaşa district of Izmir province. Approximately 30 days before flowering, Bud Feed 20 (BF20), 40 (BF40) and 60 mL L-1 (BF60) doses with Sett (3 mL L-1), Erger (50 mL L-1) + CaNO3 were treated to the sweet cherry trees from the leaf. The trees that are sprayed only with water were considered as control. Branches of similar size were selected from 4 different directions of the trees to determine flowering in sweet cherry trees, and the number of flowers bloomed on the branches recorded for 2-day intervals from March 17, when the first flowering was observed until the flowering was completed. The sweet cherry trees treated with BF40 + Sett, BF60 + Sett, and Erger + CaNO3 had the flowering 6-7 days and full bloom 7-8 days before compared to the control trees. The last flowering time of BF60 + Sett treated sweet cherry trees was 8 days earlier than the control trees, and 6 days earlier than the other treatments. It was determined that the weight and diameter of the fruits in  BF60 + Sett and Erger + CaNO3 treated sweet cherry trees were partially higher than the control, while the other quality parameters were similar. The results showed that BF60 + Sett, Erger + CaNO3 and BF40 + Sett treatments were effective in the early flowering of sweet cherry fruits.

References

Coombe, B.G. 1976. The development of fleshy fruits. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 27: 507–528.

Crisosto, C.H., Mitchell, F.G., Johnson, S. 1995. Factors in fresh market stone fruit quality. Postharvest News and Information 6: 17–21.

Díaz-Mula, H.M., Castillo, S., Martínez-Romero, D., Valero, D., Zapata, P.J., Guillén, F., Serrano, M. 2009. Sensory, nutritive and functional properties of sweet cherry as affected by cultivar and ripening stage. Food Science and Technology International 15: 535–543.

Erogul, D. 2016. Determination of physical and chemical properties of some ımportant cherry cultivars grown in İzmir. YYU J Agr Sci, 26(4): 579-585.

Guerra, M.E., Rodrigo, J. 2015. Japanese plum pollination: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 197: 674–686.

Hedhly, A., Hormaza, J.I., Herrero, M. 2007. Warm temperatures at bloom reduce fruit set in sweet cherry. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 81: 158–164.

Herrero, M., Rodrigo, J., Wünsch, A. 2017. Flowering, Fruit Set and Development. In: Cherries:Botany, Production and Uses (Editors: J. Quero-García, A. Iezzoni, J. Pulawska, G. Lang). CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.

Guimond, C.M., Andrews, P.K., Lang, G.A. 1998. Scanning electron microscopy of floral initiation in sweet cherry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123: 509–512.

Mitcham, E.J., Crisosto, C.H. 2002. Postharvest handlng systems: stone fruits. In: postharvest technology of horticultural crops, 2nd edn. (Editor: A.A: Kader) University of California, Davis, California.

Karaçalı, İ. 2016. Bahçe ürünlerinin muhafazası ve pazarlanması (Storage and Marketing of Horticultural Crops), Ege University Fac. of Agric. Publications, No: 494, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish).

Lang, G.A., Olmstead, J.W., Whiting, M.D. 2004. Sweet cherry fruit distribution and leaf populations: modeling canopy dynamics and management strategies. Acta Horticulturae 636: 591–599.

Liu, J., Sun, L., Zhang, N., Zhang, J., Guo, J., Li, C., Rajput, S.A., Qi, D. 2016. Effects of nutrient.

Lenahan, O.M., Whiting, M.D., Elfving, D.C. 2006. Gibberellic acid inhibits floral bud induction and improves ‘Bing’ sweet cherry fruit quality. HortScience 41: 654–659.

McGuire, R.G. 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27(12): 1254-1255.

Muskovics, G., Felfoldi, J., Kovacs, E., Perlaki, R., Kallay, T. 2006. Changes in physical properties during fruit ripening of Hungarian sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40: 56–63.

Olmstead, J.W., Iezzoni, A.F., Whiting, M.D. 2007. Genotypic differences in sweet cherry fruit size are pri- marily a function of cell number. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 132: 697–703.

Özçağıran, R., Ünal, A., Özeker, E., İsfendiyaroğlu, M. 2003. Ilıman iklim meyve türleri, sert çekirdekli meyveler (Temperate Fruit Types, Stone Fruits) Vol. I. Ege University Fac. of Agric. Publications, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish).

Remon, S., Ferrer, A., Venturini, M.E. and Oria, R. 2006. On the evolution of key physiological and physico- chemical parameters throughout the maturation of ‘Burlat’ cherry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86: 657–665.

Romano, G.S., Cittadini, E.D., Pugh, B., Schouten, R. 2006. Sweet cherry quality in the horticultural production chain. Stewart Postharvest Review 6(2): 1-9.

Sekse, L. 1995. Cuticular fracturing in fruits of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) resulting from changing soil water contents. Journal of Horticultural Science 70: 631–635.

Sen, F., R.E. Oksar, M. Golkarian, S Yaldiz. 2014. Quality changes of different sweet cherry cultivars at various stages of the supply chain. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 42(2): 501-506.

Sterling, C. 1964. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. I. Prunoideae: Prunus. American Journal of Botany 51: 36–44.

Thompson, M. 1996. Flowering, pollination and fruit set. In: Webster, A.D. and Looney, N.E. (eds) Cherries: Crop Physiology, Production and Uses. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

Whiting, M.D., Ophardt, D. 2005. Comparing novel sweet cherry crop load management strategies. HortScience 40: 1271–1275.

Whiting, M.D., Lang, G., Orphardt, D. 2005. Rootstock and training system affect cherry growth, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience 40: 582–586.

Whiting, M.D., Perry, R.L. 2017. Fruit harvest methods and technolohgies. In: Cherries: Botany, Production and Uses (Editors: J. Quero-García, A. Iezzoni, J. Pulawska, G. Lang). CABI, Oxfordshire.

Zoffoli, J.P., Muñoz, S., Valenzuela, L., Reyes, M. and Barros, F. (2008) Manipulation of ‘Van’ sweet cherry crop load influences fruit quality and susceptibility to impact bruising. Acta Horticulturae 795: 877–882.

Zoffoli, J.P., Toivonen, P., Wang, Y. 2017. Postharvest biology and handlng for fresh markets. In: Cherries: Botany, Production and Uses (Editors: J. Quero-García, A. Iezzoni, J. Pulawska, G. Lang). CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.

Published

2021-03-09

How to Cite

Deniz EROĞUL, Canan YILMAZ, & Fatih ŞEN. (2021). Determining The Effects Of Different Treatments On The Flowering Of Sweet Cherry Trees And Fruit Quality. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss1pp40-47

Issue

Section

Articles