Ash, Protein, Ether Extract and Carbohydrate Contents of Sorghum Genotypes Silages Grown at Eskisehir Condition


Abstract views: 6 / PDF downloads: 4

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15017735

Keywords:

Sorghum, genotype, ash, crude oil, carbohydrate

Abstract

Global warming, water scarcity, and the increasing demand for food have led growers and researchers to alternative products and methods. Therefore, sorghum, which can be grown in hot and dry conditions, has come to the forefront in recent years. For this purpose, 10 sorghum lines (104, 112, 301, 302, 304, 32-1, 8, G310, K311) and 12 registered sorghum varieties (Aldarı, Beydarı, E:Sumuc, Erdurmuş, Greengo, Gözde 80, Haybuster, Leoti, Nes, Öğretmenoğlu, Uzun, Rox) were examined in Eskişehir and similar ecologies to determine their silage contents. In the study, the contents of ash, soluble protein, ether extract, sugar, and carbohydrate were examined. Significant differences were found in all the examined traits among the lines and varieties. The average crude ash of the sorghum genotypes was determined to be 3.81%, soluble protein 52.54%, crude fat 1.48%, sugar 7.59%, and fiber content 63.92%. For silage production in Eskişehir province and similar ecological conditions, sorghum genotypes with high sugar content, particularly lines B305 and 8, as well as the Greengo and Leoti varieties, are recommended for cultivation.

 

References

Açıkgöz, E., 1995. Yem Bitkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Bursa.

Almodares, A., Hadi, M.R. 2009. Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(9): 772-780.

Anonim, 2011. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı’ndan Resmi Gazete. (www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/12/20111227-12-1.docx)(Accessed:10.09.2024)

Andrea, J.G., Hunt, C.W., Duckett, S.K., Kennington, L.R., Feng, P., Owens, F.N., Soderlund, S., 2000. Effect of high-oil corn on growth performance, diet digestibility, and energy content of finishing diets fed to beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 78: 2257-2262.

Arslan, M., Çakmakçı, S., 2011. Mısır (Zea mays) ve sorgumun (Sorghum bicolor) farklı bitkilerle birlikte yapılan silajlarının karşılaştırılmaları. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1):47-53.

Aydoğan, D., Demiroğlu Topçu, G., 2022. Farklı hasat dönemlerinin kamış (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud) bitkisinde kuru madde verimi ve bazı yem kalite özelliklerine etkisi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3): 492-499.

Awika, J., Rooney, L.W., 2004. Sorghum phytochemicals and their potential impact on human health. Phytochemistry, 65:1199–1221.

Baydar, H., 2000. Efects of gibberellic acid on male sterility, seed yield and oil and fatty acid syntheses of safower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Biology, 24(1): 159–168.

Bean, B., Mccollum, T., Pietsch, D., Rowland, M., Porter, B., Vanmeter, R., 2002. Texas panhandle forage sorghum silage trial. The Agriculture Program of Texas A&M University System.

Bahrani, M.J., Deghani Ghenateghestani, A., 2004. Summer forage sorghum yield, protein and prussic acid contents as affected by plant density and nitrogen topdressing. Journal of Agriculture Science Technology, 6:73-83.

Basmacıoğlu, H., Ergül, M., 2002. Silaj mikrobiyolojisi. Hayvansal Üretim, 43(1):12-24.

Çiğdem, G., Uzun, F., 2006. Samsun ili taban alanlarında ikinci ürün olarak yetiştirilebilecek bazı silajlık sorgum ve mısır çeşitleri üzerine bir araştırma. On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1): 14-19.

Davies, D.G., Parsek, M.R., Pearson, J.P., Iglewski, B.H., 1998. The involvement of cell to cell signlas in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science, 280(5361): 295-298.

Ebadi, M.R., Pourreza, J., Jamalian, J., Edriss, M.A., Samie, A.H., Mirhadi, S.A., 2005. Amino acid content and availability in low medium and high tannin sorghum grain for poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 4(1): 27–31.

Erkovan, Ş., Afacan, H., 2024. Performance of some sorghum genotypes under Eskişehir conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(1): 107-115.

Gençtan, T., 1998. Agricultural Ecology (Tarımsal Ekoloji). Trakya Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü Yayınları, Tekirdağ, Türkiye.

Geren, H., Avcıoğlu, R., Kavut, Y.T., Tan, K., Sargın, S., 2014. Akdeniz iklimi koşullarında yetiştirilen bazı çok yıllık sıcak mevsim buğdaygil cinslerinin yıllık sıcak mevsim buğdaygilleri ile silolanabilir verim, yem kalitesi ve biyoetanol verimi yönünden karşılaştırılması üzerine bir araştırma. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(3): 243 251.

Goni, F.M. 2001. Matchmaking between proteins and lipids. TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences, 26(9): 530-531.

House, R.L., 1985. A guide to sorghum breeding. 2nd edn. Patancheru, A.P. 502324, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

Kılınç, K., 2022. Farklı biçim zamanlarının yulaf ve tritikalenin ot verimi ve kalitesine etkileri. Yüksek lisans tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çanakkale

Kimber, C.T., 2000. Origins of domesticated sorghum and ıts early diffusion to India and China, pp. 3-96. In C. W. Smith, R.A. Frederiksen (Eds.) Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, And Production. Wiley Series in Crop Science, New York.

Küçük, O., Özpınar, H., 2004. Ruminant rasyonlarında yağ kullanımı. Gıda ve Yem Bilimi Teknolojisi Dergisi, 5: 32-38.

Li,. R., Zhang, H., Zhou, X., Guan, Y., Yao, F., Song, G., Wang, J., Zhang, C.M., 2010. Genetic diversity in Chinese sorghum landraces revealed by chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Genet Resources and Crop Evolution, 57: 1–15.

Ono, T., Choi M.R., Ikida, A., Odaoiri S., 1991. Changes in the composition and size distribution of soymilk protein particles bu heating, Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 55(9): 2291-2297.

Pino, F., Heinrichs, A.J., 2017. Sorghum forage in precision-fed dairy heifer diets. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(1): 224-235.

SAS Institute, 1998. Statistical Analysis System Institute: StatView Reference Manual. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

Soil Survey Laboratory Staff, 1992. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. USDA-SCS. Soil Survey Investigations Report No: 42.

Tenikecier, H.S., Ateş, E., 2024. Effect of adding different ratios of oat (Avena sativa L.) cracks on the silage quality of fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.). ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(3): 638-646.

Türedi, A.M., Çetingül, İ.S., 2023. Mısır silajına alternatif olarak sorgum ve ryegrass silajlarının değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 8(3): 467-473.

Ülgen, N., Yurtsever, N., 1995. Türkiye Gübre ve Gübreleme Rehberi (4. Baskı). T.C. Başbakanlık Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 209, Teknik Yayınlar No: T.66, s.230, Ankara.

Widowati, S., Luna, P., 2022. Nutritional and functional properties of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)-based products and potential valorisation of sorghum bran, The 3rd International Conference on Agricultural Postharvest Handling and Processing, Conference Proceedings Book, May 28-June 2, Boston, 1024(1): 012031.

Yılmaz, H.Ş., Kökten, K., 2020. Kadmiyum (Cd) uygulamasının bazı tane sorgum çeşitlerinin yem kalite özellikleri üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4): 775-791.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-01

How to Cite

ERKOVAN, Şule, & ERKOVAN, H. İbrahim. (2025). Ash, Protein, Ether Extract and Carbohydrate Contents of Sorghum Genotypes Silages Grown at Eskisehir Condition. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(2), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15017735

Issue

Section

Articles