1
Dicle University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Diyarbakır
2
Dicle University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Diyarbakır
3
Dicle University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Diyarbakır
Abstract
The experiment was carried out at Dicle University, Faculty of Agriculture Department of Field Crops in 2018 spring and summer season. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sowing dates (March 10, April 4 and May 4, 2018) on the phenological, morphological and yield performances of six dry bean varieties. The experiment was established randomized complete blocks design in split plots with three replications. The sowing dates significantly affected to the days to seed emergence, days to first flowering, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, first pod height, number of branches per plant, pod width, plant weight, pod weight per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, seed yield per plant, biological yield and seed yield. As the sowing date was delayed, there was decreased in all traits. The early sowing date provided better growth in cold tolerance varieties. Among the sowing dates, in early to mid-March sowing date was the most favorable for all varieties and Diyarbakir ecological conditions.
Keywords
Common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris L,planting date,growth stage,production
How to Cite
İPEKEŞEN, S., BİÇER, B. T. ., & BAYRAK, İbrhaim H. . (2022). Determination of the Effect of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield Parameters of Some Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6979678
📄Acar M., Ozcelik H., Gizlenci S., Ozyazici M.A. 2012. Determination of the most available sowing date for dry bean at the coastal zone of the black sea region of Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 5.1(2012): 55-58.
📄Akcin, A. 1988. Food Legumes. Selcuk University Publications, 43: 307-367.
📄Arslan, H., Ekin, Z., Yolbas, M. 2022. The effect of different sowing times on the yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Siirt conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2): 247-259.
📄Kaul, A., Kaur, C., Singh, G. 2018. Performance of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different sowing dates in sub-mountainous area of Punjab. Legume Research-An International Journal, 41(5): 745-749.
📄Cetin, G. 2020. Effects of different sowing dates on agronomic, morphological and biochemical changes in some beans. Master Thesis, Bayburt University, Turkey.
📄Cinar, T. 2015. Adaptation of some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to Erzurum ecological conditions and their agricultural characteristics. Master’s Thesis, Ataturk University, Turkey.
📄Esmaeilzadeh, S., Aminpanah, H. 2015. Effects of planting date and spatial arrangement on dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) yield under weed-free and weedy conditions. Planta Daninha, 33: 425-432.
📄Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research.2nd ed. John wily & Sons, New York.
📄Hlanga, N. C. 2017. Planting date, water availability and plant density effects on dry bean production (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Doctoral Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
📄Iyigun, T. 2018. Determining yield and yield components on some genotypes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Master Thesis, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey.
📄Joshi, S. K., Rahevar, H. D. 2014. Effect of dates of sowing, row spacings and varieties on growth attributing characters of rabi Indian bean (Dolichos lablab L.). Trends in Biosciences, 7(22), 3717-3721.
📄Kahraman, A. 2014. Effects of sowing dates on the yield, yield components and quality characteristics of dry bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) genotypes. Master’s thesis, Selcuk University, Turkey.
📄Mirzaienasab, M., Mojaddam, M. 2014. The effect of planting date on yield and yield components of two red bean cultivars in Azna weather conditions. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(3), 417-422.
📄Nosser, M. A., Behnan, E. Y. 2011. Effect of seed size and sowing dates on growth and yield of green and dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 89(3), 1053-1070.
📄Zhang, Q. Y., Gao, Q. L., Herbert, S. J., Li, Y. S., Hashemi, A. M. 2010. Influence of sowing date on phenological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in northeastern USA. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(18), 2556-2562.
📄Peksen, E., Gulumser, A. 2005. Relationships between seed yield and yield components and path analysis in some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes. J. of Fac. of Agric., 20(3):82-87.
📄Poehlman, J.M. 1991. The mung bean. Oxford and IBH publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Dehli India.
📄Scully, B., Wainess, J.G. 1988. Ontogeny and yield response of dry and tepary beans to temperature. Agron. J. 80 (6): 921-925.
📄Serengul, S. 2019. Determinaton of yield and yield components of some dry bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) genotypes under Bingol conditions. Master’s Thesis, Bingol University, Turkey.
📄Seyum, E. G. 2014. Influence of plant spacing and date of sowing on yield and yield components of two snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties in Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia. Merit Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 2(7), 086-095.
📄Singh, J. N. 1964. Effects of modifying the environment on flowering, fruiting, and biochemical composition of the snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Doctoral Thesis, Oregon State University, USA.
📄Tam, A. 2008. The Effect of different sowing times applications on the yield and yield components in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Van condition. Master’s Thesis, Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey.
📄Tunçturk, M., Bariş, M., Sogut, T. 2020. The effect of planting time applications on yield and yield properties in some soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) varieties. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4): 717-731.
,
Behiye Tuba BİÇER
2