Evaluation of Morphological, Quality and Yield Characteristics of Some Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties in the Eastern-Mediterranean Region
Dürdane MART
1
,
Ramazan AKIN
2
,
Meltem TÜRKERİ
3
,
Evren ATMACA
4
,
Sezgin MART
5
1
Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana
2
Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute, Eskisehir
3
Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana
4
Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute, Eskisehir
5
Hohenheim University Faculty of Crop Sciences, Stuttgart
Abstract
This research was conducted to evaluate regional adaptation of registered chickpea varieties, their yield and some yield related characteristics observed at field experiments under winter growth conditions in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey in Adana location during 2014 and 2015. The experiments were conducted in fields of Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute. During this study, the varieties were evaluated in Adana location for their fitness to winter growth conditions. In research, it was tested in total 20 varieties as 17 registered varieties and three control and examined yield, quality, disease, and pest tolerance parameters. The results of research was showed that the highest and the lowest yield resulted in 2014 for Adana location were 3.89 t/ha and 0.82 t/ha for experiment, respectively. In 2015, the highest and the lowest yield was 4.42 t/ha and 2.6 t/ha for experiment in Adana location, respectively. Akça variety, which based on the average values for the experiment prominent variety, produced highest values compared to other varieties in terms of fresh weight, water uptake capacity, wet volume and swelling capacity for quality values for both growing seasons of 2014 and 2015.
MART, D., AKIN, R. ., TÜRKERİ, M. ., ATMACA, E. ., & MART, S. . (2022). Evaluation of Morphological, Quality and Yield Characteristics of Some Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties in the Eastern-Mediterranean Region. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7031221
📄Açikgöz, N., 1987. Chickpea Agriculture, Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute Edition: 76, Menemen- Izmir, 25s.
📄Amir, Y., Haenni, A. L., Youyou, A. 2006. Differences in the biochemical composition of dry legumes cultivated in North Algeria. EJEAFChe, 5(3): 1411-1418.
📄Anlarsal, A. E., Yücel C., Ozveren, D. 1999. A study to identify the parameters of yield and yield components for chickpea in Eastern Mediterranean region. Turkish Field Crop Congress. Third edition (Forage Crops and Edible Seed Legumes), p.342- 347, 15-18 November, Adana.
📄Atikyılmaz, N. 1997. A study to identify the interaction between yield and yield components as well as some quality parameters for winter and summer chickpea. Master’s Degree Thesis (unprinted). Dicle University, 53s, Diyarbakir.
📄Bejiga, G., Tullu, A. 1982. The influence of planting dates on the yield of three chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences.
📄Gül, M.K., Egesel, C.Ö., Kahrıman, F., Tayyar, S. 2006. The possibilities to grow winter chickpea in Canakkale region. Uludag University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 20(1): 57-66.
📄Kökten, K., Kaplan, M., Seydoşoğlu, S., Yılmaz, H.Ş., Uçar, R. 2018. Determination of herbage yield and quality of some bitter vetch [Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd] genotypes in Bingöl ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(3): 236-245.
📄Kökten, K., Kaplan, M., Seydoşoğlu, S., Tutar, H., Özdemir, S. 2019. Determination of seed yield, straw yield and quality of some bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia L. Willd) genotypes in Bingöl ecological conditions. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 56(1): 27-33.
📄Ipekeşen S., Basdemir F., Tunc M., Bicer B.T. 2022. Minerals, vitamins, protein and amino acids in wild Cicer species and pure line chickpea genotypes selected from a local population. J. Elem., 27(1): 127 - 140.
📄Ipekeşen, S., Biçer, B.T. 2021. The Effect of fertilization on plant and agricultural traits of chickpeas. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(2): 320-332.
📄Mart, D., Cansaran, E., Karaköy, T., Simşek, M. 2003. Obtaining the agronomical and morphological features as well as the selection mechanism and quantitative characters for local chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties of Cukurova region. Turkey Congress of Field Crops – V Edition 13-17 October 2003, Diyarbakır.
📄Mart, D. 2006. Investigation of relations among Ascochyta blight and plant morphology with multi – regrassion on winter planted chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties in the Cukurova region, Ascochyta, 2-6 Temmuz, Le Tronchet, France.
📄Ozcan, M.A., Yücel, D. 2022. Determination of winter chickpea genotypes that can be grown in Sirnak-Idil conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(1): 99-109.
📄Saxena, M.C. 1980.Recent advances in chickpea agronomy. In proceedings of the first international workshop on chickpea improvement, 28 Feb- 2 Mar 1979. Icrisat, Hyderabat, India, s, 89-96.
📄Slim, S.N., Saxena. M.C. 1993. Adaptation of spring-sown chickpea to the Mediterranean basin. II Factors influencing yield under drought, Field Crops Research, 34: 137-146.
📄Sehirali, S. 1988. Food Legumes. Ankara University Faculty of Agricultural Publications, 1089, Ankara, 435s.
📄Soysal, S., Erman, M. 2020. The effects of microbiological and inorganic fertilizers on the quality characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in the ecological conditions of Siirt. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4): 923-939.
📄Tivoli, B., Banniza, S. 2007. Comparison of the epidemiology of Ascochyta blight on seed legumes. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119: 59-76.
📄Tripathi, H.P., Singh, S.N. 1985. Performance of chickpea varieties under different dates of sowing. International Chickpea Newsletter, 13: 11-13.
📄Zirek, İ., Togay, N. 2021. Determination of yield and some yield components of the registered dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars of Turkey in Van conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(3): 585-597.
,
Ramazan AKIN
2