2
Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Şanlıurfa
Abstract
This study was carried out in order to determine the effect of the different of plants densities per unit area on yield and yield components of soybean second crop conditions at GAP Agricultural Research Institute, Gündaş Research Station in 2021. The study, in which three different plant densities (I row at 70 cm, II row at 70 cm and III row at 70 cm) were tested and five different soybean (Gapsoy-16, Lider, Blaze, Ataem-7 ve Adasoy) varieties were used as material, was established according to the randomized blocks split plot design with three replication. In the study, the effect of different plant densities on yield was found to be statistically significant at 1%, while the yield difference between cultivars and the responses of cultivars to different plant densities were found to be statistically insignificant. The lowest yield was obtained from the application the one row at 70 cm with 206.22 kg da-1, while the highest yield was obtained from the application the three row at 70 cm with with 269.41 kg da-1. As a result of the study, it will be more profitable for second crop soybean growers to plant third row soybean at 70 cm row spacing.
Keywords
Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill),between rows,plant density,yield,variety
How to Cite
ŞENGÖZ, M. E., & ARSLAN, H. . (2022). The Effect of Different Sowing Frequency on Yield and Yield Components in Second Crop Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) Cultivation. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(4), 842–851. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7378075
📄Açıkgöz, E., Sincik, M., Karasu, A., Tongel, O., Wietgrefe, G., Bilgili, U., Öz, M., Albayrak, S., Turan, Z.M., Goksoy, A.T. 2009. Forage soybean production for seed in mediterranean environments. Field Crop Research 110: 213-218.
📄Anonim 2022a. https://biruni.tuik.gov. tr/medas/?kn=140&locale=tr (Erişim Tarihi 20.06.2022)
📄Arıoğlu, H.H. 2000. Yağ bitkileri yetiştirme ve ıslahı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitapları, Yayın No:A-70, 2. Baskı, s:45, Adana.
📄Arıoğlu, H.H. 2007. Yağ bitkileri yetiştirme ve ıslahı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat fakültesi Ders Kitapları, Yayın No:A-70, s:204, Adana.
📄Bowers, G.R., Rabb, J.L., Ashlock, L.O., Santini, J.B. 2000. Row spacing in the early soybean production system. Agron. J. 92:524-531.
📄Bullock, D, Khan, S., Rayburn, A. 1998. Soybean Yield Responce to Narrow Rows is Largely Due to Enhanced Early Growth. Crop Science, 38(4): 1011-1016.
📄Carrora, I.M., Olıvelra, E.F.DE., Rocha, A. 1983. Effect of plant population at two spacing on grain yield and other charecteristics of soybeans (Glycine max L. Merill). Field crop, 36(11): 76-93.
📄Cordonnier, M.J., Johnson, T.J. 1983. Effect of wastewater ırrigation and plant and row spacing on soybean yield and development. Agronomy Journal, 75: 908-913.
📄Costa, J.A., Oplinger, E.S., Pendleton, J.W. 1980. Response of soybean cultivars to planting patterns 1. Agronomy Journal, 72(1): 153-156.
📄Çalışkan, S., Arslan, M., Üremiş, İ., Çalışkan, M.E. 2007. The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture Forage. 31:147-154.
📄Edwards, J., Purcell, L. 2005. Soybean yield and biomass responses to mıncreasing plant population among diverse maturity groups. Crop Science Society of America 45: 1770-1777.
📄Egli, D.B. 1988. Plant density and soybean yield. Crop Science, 28(6): 977-981.
📄Ferreira, A.,S., Balbinot, A., A., Flavia, F., Claudemir, W., Julio, Z., Franchini, C., Debiasi, H. 2016. Plant density and mineral nitrogen fertilization influencing yield, yield components and concentration of oil and protein in soybean grains. Bragantia, 75(3): 362-370.
📄Kasperbauer, M.J. 1987. Far-Red light reflection from green leaves and effects on phytochrome-mediated assimilate partitioning under field conditions. Plant Physiol, 85: 350–354.
📄Kolpak, R. 1992. Yield formation of soybean cv. ajma depending on density and date of sowing. Fiel Crop, 45(12): 8456.
📄Lueschen, W.E., Hicks, D.R. 1977. Influence of plant population on field performance of three soybean cultivars 1. Agronomy Journal, 69(3): 390-393.
📄Mauad M, Silva T.L.B., Almeida Neto AI Abreu V.G. 2010. Influência da densidade de semeadura sobre características agronômicas na cultura da soja. Revista Agrarian, 03:175-181.
📄Öz, M. 2002. Bursa Mustafa Kemalpaşa ekolojik koşullarında farklı bitki populasyonları ve azot dozlarının soyanın verim ve verim unsurlarına etkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16: 165-177.
📄Özçınar, A.B. 2021. Effects of high and chilling temperatures on soybean crop. International Siirt Conference On Scientific Research Siirt University, November 5-7, 309-316.
📄Paraginski, J., Toebe, A., Moraes, M., de Souza M.R.R. 2022. Yield components of soybean cultivars under sowing densities. Revista Ceres, 69(4):416-424.
📄Parks, W.L. 1983. Soybean row width more ımportanat than plant spacing within row. Better Crops With Plant Food Pub. Potash and Phospahate Ins. 2801 Buford Huy., N.E., Atlanta, Ga 300329.
📄Patharadilok, H. 1991. Growth, development and yield performance of soybean [Glycine max], mungbean [Vigna radiata] and blackgram [Vigna mungo] grown at different sowing dates and plant populations.
📄Pawlowski, F., Jedruszczak, M., Bojarcazyk, M. 1993. Yield of soybean cv. polan on loens soil depending in row spacing and sowing rate. Field Crop, 46 (2): 978.
📄Peluzio, J.M. Gomes, R.S., Rocha, R.N.C., Dary, E.P., Fidelis, R.R. 1998. Density and spacing of the plants in the soybean cultivar conquista in gurupi, city of tocantins state. Bioscience Journal 14(1).
📄Piggot, G.J., Farrel, C.C. 1983. Soybean in Noutland: Seeding Rate for 15 cm Row Spacing. Field. Crops, 36 (3): 2370.
📄Prasan, Y., Umporn, S.., Wanchai, C. 1983. Improved cultural pratices ın soybean. kasetsart unv., bangkok (Thailand). Research Reports. Raingan Khon Khwa Wichai Pracham Pi. 2526 Bankok (Thailand). P:5-6.
📄Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.M., Anwar, M. P., Juraimi, A.S. 2011. Plant density influence on yield and nutritional quality of soybean seed. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 10(2): 125.
📄Rahman, M., Hossain, M. 2011. Plant density effects on growth, yield and yield components of two soybean varieties under equidistant planting arrangement. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 10(5): 278-286.
📄Seadh, S.E., Abido, W. A.E. 2013. How soybean cultivars canopy affect yield and quality. J. of Agron, 12(1): 46-52.
📄Switer, S., Craig, E.A., Michael, H.D. 2004. Forage soybean yield and quality responses to plant density and row distance. Society of Agronomy 96: 966-970.
📄Shamsi, K., Kobraee, S. 2009. Effect of plant density on the growth, yield and yield components of three soybean varieties under climatic conditions of Kermanshah, Iran. Animal and Plant Science. Journal, 2(2): 96-99.
📄Singh, K.P., Sinha, T.K., Rai, R.N. 1985. Effect of dates of sowing and spacing on grain yield of soybean (Glycine max.). Seed and Farms, 11 (8): 32-33.
📄Tourino, M.C.C., Rezende, P.M.D., Salvador, N. 2002. Espaçamento, densidade e uniformidade de semeadura na produtividade e características agronômicas da soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37: 1071-1077.
📄Tunçtürk, M., Mehmet, B., Söğüt, T 2020. The effect of planting time applications on yield and yield properties in some soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Varieties. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4): 717–731.
📄Tunio, S., Rajpul, M.J., Rajpul, M.A., Rajpul, F.K. 1984. Effect of spacing on the growth and yield of soybean. Field Crops, 37 (6): 4128.
📄Wells, R. 1991. Soybean growth response to plant density: Relationships among canopy photosynthesis, leaf area, and light interception. Crop Science, 31(3): 755-761.
📄Yılmaz, H.A. 1996. Kahramanmaraş ekolojisinde farklı ekim sıklıklarının, iki soya çeşidinde verim ve verim unsurlarına etkisi. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry 23:223-232.
,
Hüseyin ARSLAN
2