Forage Yield, Nutritional Value and Phytotrepic Traits of Hops (Humulus lupulus L.)


Abstract views: 191 / PDF downloads: 128

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8041412

Keywords:

Hop, forage, animal yield, animal quality, phytotherapy

Abstract

Medicinal plants increases animal yield and quality; they also play an alternative role in the treatment of animal diseases thanks to their phytotrepic properties. One of these plants is hop (Humulus lupulus L.). A hop contains significant amounts of polyphenols, crude protein, and crude ash, and it’s also easy digestibility. It contributes to animal health, yield, and quality due to these traits. This study, it was aimed to determine the hay yield and quality of hop. The five different age groups (3, 5, 10, 15, and 20) of two varieties of hop (Brewers Gold and Aroma) were used in the study.  The samples were investigated for hay yield, protein yield, acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), potassium, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, total phenolic (TPC), total flavonoid (TFC), condensed tannin (CT) and total alkaloid content (TA). The highest hay yield was determined in the 5 age group (568.57 and 663.38 kg da-1, respectively) of both varietites and in the 10 age group (568.71 kg da-1) of Aroma variety. The highest protein yield was determined at 5 and 10 years of age (108.11 and 89.20 kg da-1, respectively) of Aroma variety. The K, P, Ca and Mg contents were ranged between 1.680-2.477%, 0.327-0.420%, 0.817-1.500% and 0.420-0.720%, respectively. The lowest TA of 2.95% was determined in the 15 age group of Aroma variety. The CT of hop varied between 1.38%-5.42%, the TPC ranged between 11.78-43.41 mg GA g-1, and the TFC 12.47-13.32 mg QE g-1. As a result, it has been determined that hop can be considered as an alternative roughage source in terms of the all properties examined. Besides, the hop obtained from 5 ages in Brewers gold variety is better than other treatments.

References

Ahemad, M., Zaidi, A., Saghir Khan, M., Oves, M., 2009. Biological importance of phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing microbes - an overview. In: MS. Khan, A. Zaidi (Ed), Phosphate Solubilising Microbes for Crop Improvement, Nova Science Publishers, Newyork, pp. 1-14.

Arvouet-Grand, A., Vennat, B., Pourrat, A., Legret, P., 1994. Standardisation d`un extrait de propolis et identification des principaux constituants. Journal de Pharmacie de Belgique, 49: 462-468.

Bate-Smith, E.C., 1975. Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 14: 1107-1113.

Cole, E., 2020. Understanding your forage test. (http://extension.missouri.edu/webster/documents/resources/agriculture/UnderstandingYourForageTest.pdf), (Erişim tarihi: 13.04.2020).

Da Rosa Almeida, A., de Oliveira Brisola Maciel, M.V., Machado, M.H, Bazzo, G.C, de Armas, R.D., Vitorino, V.B., Vitali, L., Block, J.M., Barreto, P.L.M., 2020. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of Brazilian hop (Humulus lupulus L.) extracts. International Journal of Food Science, 55(1): 340-347

Davidović, V., Todorović, M.J., Stojanović, B., Relić, R., 2012. Plant usage in protecting the farm animal health. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 28(1): 87-98.

Frozza, C.O.S., Garcia, C.S.C, Gambato, G., de Souza, M.D., Salvador, M., Moura, S., Padilha, F.F., Seixas, F.K., Collares, T., Borsuk, S., Dellagostin, O.A., Henriques, J.A.P., Roesch-Ely, M., 2013. Chemical characterization, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Brazilian red propolis. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 52: 137-142.

INEN, 2005. Grano desamargado de chocho Norma Tecnica Ecuatoriana Leguminosas Grano desamargado de chocho. Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalizacion, Quito.

İbrik, C., 2020. The contribution of hop cultivation to the economy and development of the pazaryeri district of Bilecik province. Master Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara.

İncekara, F., 1964. Industrial plants and breeding book. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 4(84): 180.

Kaya, S., 2009. Veterinary Pharmacology. Medisan Publishing House, Ankara.

Kaymak Bayram, G., Gülümser, E., Can, M., Acar, İ., Ayan, İ., 2022. Forage quality of Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C. H. Stirt genotypes at different growth periods. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3): 511-519.

Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G., Karnezos, T.P., Keeling, J.W., 1993. Mineral concentrations in forage sorghum grown under two harvest management systems. Agronomy Journal, 85: 826-833.

Kowalczyk, E., Patyra, E., Kwiatek, K., 2013. Organic acids and their importance in animal husbandry. Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 69(5): 269-273.

Kumar, R., Singh, M., 1984. Tannins: Their adverse role in ruminant nutrition. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 32: 447-453.

Luscher, A., Suter, M., Finn, J.A., 2016. Legumes and grasses in mixtures complement each other ideally for sustainable forage production. Legume Research, 12: 8-10.

Martin, C., Copani, G., Niderkorn, V., 2016. Impacts of forage legumes on intake, digestion and methane emissions in ruminants. Legume Research, 12: 24-25.

O’Connell, J.E.O., Fox, P., 2001. Significance and applications of phenolic compounds in the production and quality of milk and dairy products: a review. International Dairy Journal, 11(3): 103-120.

Okafor, V.N., Anyalebechi, R.I., Okafor, U.W., Okonkwo, C.P., Obiefuna, J.N., Obiadi, M.C., 2020. Phytochemical constituents of extracts of hop and some potential nigerian hop substitutes: a comparative study in beer brewing. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 1(1): 1-7.

Önal Aşçı, Ö., Acar, Z., 2018. Inorganic substances found in the structure of the plant. In: Ö. Önal Aşçı, Z. Acar (Ed), Minerals. Agriculture engineers chamber press, Ankara, pp. 68-69.

Öztürk, Y.E., Gülümser, E., Mut, H., Başaran, U., Çopur Doğrusöz, M., 2020. Determination of silage quality of mixtures in hop with corn and forage soybean. Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science, 24(4): 440-446.

Paula, E.M., Samensari, R.B., Machado, E., Pereira, L.M., Maia, F.J., 2016. Effects of phenolic compounds on ruminal protozoa population, ruminal fermentation, and digestion in water buffaloes. Livestock Science, 185: 136-41.

Robbins, R.J., 2003. Phenolic acids in foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51: 2866-2887.

Russo, R., Autore, G., Severino, L., 2009. Pharmaco-toxicological aspects of herbal drugs used in domestic animals. Natural Product Communications, 4(12): 1777-1784.

Seradj, A.R., Abecia, L., Crespo, J., Villalba, D., Fondevila, M., Balcelss, J., 2014. The effect of Bioflavex® and its pure flavonoid components on in vitro fermentation parameters and methane production in rumen fluid from steers given high concentrate diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 197: 85-91.

Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R., Lamuela-Raventos, R.M., 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299:152-178.

Ramírez-Restrepo, C.A., Barry, T.N., 2005. Review: Alternative temperate forages containing sec ondary compounds for improving sustainable productivity in grazing ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 120: 179-201.

Tekeli, A.S., Ateş, S., 2005. Yield potential and mineral composition of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) – tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) mixtures. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6: 27-34.

Yogeshpriya, S., Selvara, P., 2018. Mastery of potassium status and their consequences of hypokalemia in dairy cattle. Shanlax International Journal of Veterinary Science, 5(3): 1-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-21

How to Cite

ÖZTÜRK, Y. E., & GÜLÜMSER, E. (2023). Forage Yield, Nutritional Value and Phytotrepic Traits of Hops (Humulus lupulus L.). ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(2), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8041412

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)