Hüseyin GÜNGÖR
1
,
Mehmet Fatih ÇAKIR
2
,
Berkay Hakkı KANTAR
3
,
Bahar GEDİK
4
,
Ziya DUMLUPINAR
5
1
Düzce University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Düzce
2
Düzce University, Environment and Health Coordination, Düzce
3
Düzce University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Düzce
4
Düzce University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Düzce
5
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Kahramanmaraş
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the grain yield, yield components and quality characteristics of 15 oat cultivars in Düzce province in the 2021-2022 growing season. The experiment was established in a randomized complete block design with three replications In this study, oat cultivars were examined panicle length, grain number per panicle, grain weight per panicle, thousand kernel weight, test weight, groat percentage and grain yield. According to the results, the average panicle length ranged from 13.23 to 20.83 cm, grain number per panicle ranged from 37.83 to 86.83, grain weight per panicle ranged from 0.96 to 2.75 g, thousand kernel weight ranged from 19.86 to 42.36 g, test weight ranged from 43.45 to 60.08 kg hl-1, groat percentage ranged from 74.2% to 100.0%, and grain yield varied between 201.4 and 414.8 kg da-1. According to the biplot graph, the analysis indicated that grain yield had a positive relationship with panicle length, grain number per panicle, and grain weight per panicle, while having a negative relationship with test weight and groat percentage. Correlation analysis revealed a positive relationship between grain yield and the number of grains per panicle, grain number per panicle, grain weight per panicle, thousand kernel weight, and test weight, while it had a negative relationship with groat percentage and panicle length.
Keywords
Oat,yield,biplot graph,correlation analysis
How to Cite
GÜNGÖR, H., ÇAKIR, M. F., KANTAR, B. H., GEDİK, B., & DUMLUPINAR, Z. (2023). Evaluation of Some Oat Cultivars for Grain Yield, Yield Components and Quality Traits in Düzce Ecological Conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(4), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10207705
📄Batalova, G.A., Gorbunova, L.A., 2009. Oat yield and seed quality depending on sowing rate. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 35(1): 18-19.
📄Buerstmayr, H., Krenn, N., Stephan, U., Grausgruber, H., Zechner, E., 2007. Agronomic performance and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes of worldwide origin produced under central European growing conditions. Field Crops Research, 101(3): 341-351.
📄Çalışkan, M., Koç, A., 2019. Morphological charactersation of oat landraces belonging to the western Mediterranean region. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 28(1): 7-18.
📄Dumlupınar, Z., 2010. Characterization of Turkey origin oat genotypes by avenin proteins according to morphological, phenological and agronomic traits. PhD Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş.
📄Dumlupinar, Z., Maral, H., Kara, R., Dokuyucu, T., Akkaya, A., 2011. Evaluation of turkish oat landraces based on grain yield, yield components and some quality traits. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16(2): 190-196.
📄Dumlupınar, Z., Güngör, H., Dokuyucu, T., Akkaya, A., 2017. Determination of relationships between grain yield and some agronomic traits by correlation and path analysis in oat (Avena spp.). Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 14(1): 61-68.
📄Ercan, K., Tekin, A., Herek, S., Kurt, A., Kekeç, E., Olgun, M.F., Dokuyucu, T., Dumlupınar, Z., Akkaya, A., 2016. Performance of local oat lines in Kahramanmaraş conditions. KSU Journal of Natural Sciences, 19(4): 438-444.
📄Finnan, J., Burke, B., Spink, J., 2019. The effect of nitrogen timing and rate on radiation interception, grain yield and grain quality in autumn sown oats. Field Crops Research, 231: 130-140.
📄Flander, L., Suortti, T., Katina, K., Poutanen, K., 2010. Effects of wheat sourdough process on the quality of mixed oat-wheat bread. Food Science and Technology, 44: 656-664.
📄Güngör, H., Çakır, M.F., Dumlupınar, Z., 2022. Evaluation of wheat genotypes: genotype × environment interaction and GGE biplot analysis. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(1): 149-157.
📄Güngör, H., Çakır, M.F., Dumlupınar, Z., 2023. Determination of grain yield and agricultural traits of some oat cultivars at different locations. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 6(4): 350-355.
📄İnan, A.S., Özbaş, M.O., Çağırgan, M.İ., 2005. Evaluation of oat lines used in human nutrition in terms of agricultural and quality characteristics. Turkey VI. Field Crops Congress, 5-6 September 2005, Antalya, s. 1153-1155.
📄Iannucci, A., Codianni, P., Cattivelli, L., 2011. Evaluation of genotype diversity in oat germplasm and definition of genotypes adapted to the mediterranean environment. Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Agronomy, Article ID 870925.
📄JMP®, Version 15.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2020.
📄Kahraman, T., Avcı, Y.R., Kurt, C., 2017. Determination of grain yield, quality and agronomic traits of some oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 26 (Special Issue): 74−79.
📄Kahraman, T., Avcı, R., Yıldırım, M., 2021. Determination of grain yield, yield components and quality traits of oat genotypes (A. sativa L.). KSU Journal of Natural Sciences, 24(5): 1003-1010.
📄Kapoor, R., Bajaj, R.K., Sidhu, N., Kaur, S., 2011. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in oat (Avena sativa L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding, 5(2): 133-136.
📄Kara, R., Dumlupınar, Z., Hışır, Y., Dokuyucu, T., Akkaya, A., 2007. Evaluation of oat varieties in terms of grain yield and yield components in Kahramanmaraş conditions. Türkiye VII. Field Crops Congress, 25-27 June, Erzurum.
📄Keçecioğlu, Y., Kara, R., Dokuyucu, T., 2021. Determination of genetic differences and improvements of some oat genotypes in terms of morphological and agricultural characteristics. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 8(1): 103-115.
📄Maral, H., Dumlupınar, Z., Dokuyucu, T., and Akkaya, A., 2013. Response of sıx oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars to nitrogen fertilization for agronomical traits. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18(2): 254-259.
📄Marjanović-Jeromela, A., Marinković, R., Mijić, A., Jankulovska, M., Zdunić, Z., 2007. Interrelationship between oil yield and other quantitative traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 8(2): 165-170.
📄Marshall, A., Cowan, S., Edwards, S., Griffiths, I., Howarth, C., Langdon, T., White, E., 2013. Crops that feed the world 9. Oats-a cereal crop for human and livestock feed with industrial applications. Food Security, 5(1): 13-33.
📄Mut, Z., Erbaş Köse, Ö.D., Akay, H., Sezer, E., 2021 Evaluation of some characteristics of local oat genotypes collected from the central and western black sea region. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(2): 1582-1594.
📄Pixley, K.V., Frey, K.J., 1991. Inheritance of test weight and its relationship with grain yield of oat. Crop Science, 31: 36-40.
📄Sabandüzen, B., Akçura, M., 2017. Evaluation of grain yield and yield components of oat genotypes in Çanakkale conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 4(2): 101-108.
📄Sarı, N., İmamoğlu, A., 2011. Determination of Improved Oat Lines Suitable for Menemen Ecologial Conditions. Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 21(1): 16-25.
📄Sarı, N., İmamoğlu, A., Yıldız, Ö., 2012. Yield and quality characteristics of some advanced oat lines in Menemen ecological conditions. Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 22(1): 18-32.
📄Sarı, N., Ünay, A., 2015. Determining characteristics affecting grain yield of oats (Avena sativa L.) Journal of Central Research Institute for Field Crops, 24(2): 115-123.
📄Sobayoğlu, R., Topal, A., 2016. Evaluation of spring sown oat genotypes (Avena sativa L.) in terms of yield and yield components under Karaman conditions. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 5(1): 28-34.
📄Şahin, M., Akçacık, A.G., Aydoğan, S., Hamzaoğlu, S., Çeri, S., Demir, B., 2017. Determination of some physical traits and nutrient components in oat (Avena sativa spp.) Journal of Bahri Dagdas Animal Research, 6(1):23-28.
📄Şahin, M., Çeri, S., Göçmen Akçacık, A., Aydoğan, S., Hamzaoğlu, S., Demir, B., 2019. Investigation of relationships between yield and technological properties of winter oat (Avena sativa spp.) genotypes. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 8(1): 34-42.
📄Tamm, I., 2003. Genetic and environmental variation of grain yield of oat varieties. Agronomy Research, 1: 93-97.
📄Uzun, A., Halil, D.S., 2019. Seed yield and some quality characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes growing at Bursa ecological conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University, 33(2): 293-305.
📄Valentine, J., Cowan, A.A., Marshall, A.H., 2011. Oat breeding. Oats chemistry and technology. Chapter 2. International Standard Book Number: 978-1-891127-64-9.
📄Wickham, H., 2009. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
📄Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q., Szlavnics, Z., 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, (40): 597–605.
📄Yan, W., Kang, M., 2003. GGE biplot analysis. A graphical tool breeders. Geneticists and agronomists. 1St Edn, CRC Press. Florida.
📄Yan, W., Tinker, N.A., 2006. Biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86: 623–645.
📄Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S., Cornelius, P.L., 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by-environment data. Crop Science, 47: 643-655.
,
Mehmet Fatih ÇAKIR
2