Effect of Adding Different Ratios of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Cracks on the Silage Quality of Fodder Pea (Pisum arvense L.)
Abstract views: 146
/ 
PDF downloads: 81
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12607765Keywords:
Fodder pea, silage, cracked oat grain, silage qualityAbstract
Silage is an optimal method for preserving high-quality forage and forage legumes are vital feed resources for ruminants and can be utilized in various forms, including hay, silage, and grazing. The fodder peas is a versatile crop, utilized for grain production, herbage, hay, pasture, green manure, and silage, either as a monoculture or in combination with cereals. Feeds such as fodder peas, characterized by high levels of crude protein, mineral content, and buffering capacity, but low levels of water-soluble carbohydrates, require the addition of specific additives to enhance silage fermentation. The research was conducted to determine the effect of the cracked oat grains on fodder peas silage quality. Fresh fodder peas was harvested at full-bloom stage and ensiled with 3 %, 6 % 9 % and 12 % added cracked oat grains in plastic bags for 45 days. The crude protein (%), crude ash (%), ADF (%), NDF (%), P (%), K (%), Ca (%), Mg (%), digestible dry matter (DDM) (%), dry matter intake (DMI) (%), total digestible nutrients (TDN), net energy-lactation (NEl), net energy-maintenance (NEm), net energy-gain (NEg), fleig score, and relative feed value (RFV) were determined. The dry matter of ensiled fodder peas and cracked oat grain added fodder peas silage varied between 38.30-39.54%. The pH values were between 4.15-4.50 in silage of fodder peas and cracked oat grain added fodder peas silages. Fleig score values were varied between 101.47-118.21. According to the Fleig scores, adding 12% cracked oat grains to fodder peas during siloing may be recommended to obtain silage.
References
Açıkgöz, N., Akbaş, M.E., Moghaddam, A., Özcan, K., 1994. Database-based Turkish statistics program for PCs: TARIST. Turkey 1st Field Crops Congress, 25-29 April, İzmir, Türkiye, p: 264–267.
AOAC, 2019. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 21st Ed, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, USA.
Ates, E., 2017. Slope aspect has effects on vegetation and forage traits of anthropogenic pasture under two grazing treatments. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad del Zulia, 34: 236-252.
Ates, E., Coskuntuna, L., Tekeli, A.S. 2010. The amino acid and fiber contents of four different annual forage legumes at full-bloom stage. Cuba. Journal of Agricultural Science, 44:73-78.
Ates, E., Tekeli, A.S., 2005. Forage quality and tetany potential of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.) mixtures. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 39: 97-102.
Ates, E., Tenikecier, H.S., 2020. In ergocalciferol content and someagronomic characters among growth stages in six field pea genotypes. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 9: 6-14.
Ates, E., Tenikecier, H.S., 2022. Effect of phosphorus fertilization on silage quality of Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.). Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 11: 30-36.
Ateş, E., 2012. Field Pea [Yem Bezelyesi]. Hasad Hayvancilik, 28(329): 62-63.
Azevedo, J.A.G., Valadares Filho, S.C., Pina, D.S., Valadares, R.F.D., Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F., Diniz, L.L., Fernandes, H.J., 2011. Intake, total digestibility, microbial protein production, and the nitrogen balance in ruminant diets based on agricultural and agro-industrial by-products. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 63: 114-123.
Borreani, G., Cavallarin, L., Antoniazzi, S., Tabacco, E., 2006. Effect of the stage of growth, wilting and inoculation in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) silages. I. Herbage composition and silage fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86: 1377-1382.
Boyles, S., Johnson, L., 2024. Oats as a feed for beef cattle. ( https://agnr.osu.edu/sites/a gnr/files/imce/pdfs/Beef/OatsAsFeedForBeefCattle.pdf), (Accessed:01.03.2024).
Burgu, L., Mut, H., 2023. Silage yield and some quality traits of silage maize varieties growing as second crop. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 20(1): 12-24.
Canbolat, Ö., Akbay, K.C., Kamalak, A., 2019. Possibilities of use of molasses as carbohydrate source in pea silages. Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 22(1): 122-130.
CCOF, 2020. California Certified Organic Farmers: What is dry matter and why is this important? Certification Services, LLC; CCOF Inc., CCOF Foundation, 2155 Delaware Avenue, Suite 150, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Demiroğlu Topçu, G., Kahya, M.E., 2023. İskenderiye üçgülü (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) ile İtalyan çimi (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) karışımlarının bazı silaj özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Research Journal of Biology Sciences, 16(1): 8-15.
Düzgüneş, O., Kesici, T., Kavuncu, O., Gürbüz, F., 1987. Research and Trial Methods (Statistical Methods II). Ankara University Agricultural Faculty Press No.1021, Ankara.
Er, E., Mut, H., 2023. Determination of silage quality of mixtures of berseem clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.) and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) under Bilecik conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(4): 730-738.
Fernandes, G.M., Possenti, R.A., de Mattos, W.T., Schammass, E.A., Junior, E.F., 2013. In situ degradability and selected ruminal constituents of sheep fed with peanut forage hay. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 67: 393-405.
Geren, H., 2001. Effect of sowing dates on silage characteristics of different maize cultivars grown as second crop under Bornova conditions. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 38: 47-54.
Gümüştaş, M., Turan, N., 2022. Investigation of the effect of some cereals mixing with different proportions of feed pea (Pisum sativum L.) on silage quality. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(1): 118-130.
Heuze, V., Tran, G., Edouard, N., Lebas, F., 2017. Maize silage. Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO, (https://feedipedia.org/node/13883), (Accessed: 01.03.2024).
İleri, O., Erkovan, S., Erkovan, H.İ., Koç, A. 2020. Silage quality of second forage pea at different plant densities and cereal mixtures. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1: 35-45.
İleri, O., Kara, E., Erkovan, Ş., Sürmen, M., Erkovan, H.İ., Koç, A., 2022. Silage quality of corn grown at different weed densities. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 3(2): 36-40.
Isaac, R.A., Johson JR, W.C., 1998. Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. (Ed: Kalra, Y.P.). Elemental Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry. CRC Press, Washington DC, USA, 165-170.
Jacobs, J.L., Morris, R.J., Zorrilla-Rios, J., 1995. Effect of ensiling whole barley grain with pasture on silage quality and effluent production, and the performance of growing cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35: 731-738.
Jia, T., Wang, B., Yu, Z., Wu, Z., 2021. The effects of stage of maturity and lactic acid bacteria inoculants on the ensiling characteristics, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop oat silages. Grassland Science, 67: 55–62.
Jian, W., Lei, C., Xian-jun, Y., Gang, G., Jun-feng, L.I., Yun-feng, B., Tao, S., 2017. Effects of molasses on the fermentation characteristics of mixed silage prepared with rice straw, local vegetable by-products and alfalfa in Southeast China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(3): 664-670.
Jones, D.I.H., Jones, R., Moseley. G., 1990. Effect of incorporating rolled barley in autumn cut ryegrass silage on effluent production, silage fermentation and cattle performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, 115:399-408.
Kaiser, A.G., 2004. Successful Silage. (Eds: Kaiser, A.G., Piltz, J.W., Burns, H.M., Griffiths, N.W.) Silage Additives. Dairy Australia and New South Wales Department of Primary Industries. New South Wales, Australia.
Kılıç, A., 2006. Determination of Quality in Roughage [Kaba Yemlerde Niteliğin Saptanması]. Hasat Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 159.
Kılıç, A., 2010. Silo Feed [Silo Yemi]. Hasad Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Kılıç, A., Yalçın, S., Yılmaz, A., 2000. Ruminant beslemede kaba yem kaynaklarında yapılabilecek iyileştirmeler. TUYEM 5. Uluslararası Yem Kongresi ve Yem Sergisi. 1-2 Mayıs, Antalya.
Kızılşimşek, M., Demiroğlu Topçu, G., Akbay, F., 2023. The effect of different mixture ratios of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) on some silage quality characteristics. International Journal of Applied Biology and Environmental Sciences, 5: 53-63.
Limin Kung, J.R., Stokes, M.R., Lin, C.J., 2003. Silage Science and Technology (Eds: Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E., Harrison, H.) Silage Additives. (Agronomy Series No. 42), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 305-360.
McDonald, P., Henderson, A.R., Heron, S.J.E., 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd edition. Chalcombe Publications; Bucks, England.
Ni, K., Wang, F., Zhu, B., Yang, J., Zhou, G., Pan, Y., Tao, Y., Zhong, J., 2017. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage. Bioresource Technology, 238: 706-715.
Önal Aşçı, Ö., Acar, Z., 2018. Quality in Forages. TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural Engineers Publications, Ankara, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
Pahlow, G., Rammer, C., Slottner, D., Tuori, M., 2002. Ensiling of legumes. Legume Silages for Animal Production: LEGSIL. An International Workshop supported by the EU and held in Braunschweig (Eds: R. J. Wilkins, C. Paul.), Conference Proceeding Book, 8-9 July 2001, Braunschweig, pp. 27-32.
Reed, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., 1984. Estimating the nutritive value of crop residue and agro-industrial by-products by chemical methods. Proceedings of the FAO/ILCA Expert Consultation, 5–9 March, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Rohweder, D.A., Barnes, R.F., Jorgensen, N., 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science, 47:747-759.
Rooke, J.A., Hatfield, R.D., 2003. Biochemistry of Ensiling. Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty, 1399.
Sayar, M.S., Han, Y., 2016. Forage yield performance of forage pea (Pisum sativum spp. arvense L.) genotypes and assessment using GGE biplot analysis. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 18: 1621-1634.
Schroeder, J.W., 1994. Interpreting Forage Analysis. Extension Dairy Specialist (NDSU), AS-1080, North Dakota State University.
Servet, A., Ate, E., 2004. Determination of some agricultural characters in field pea (Pisum arvense L.) lines at Tekirdağ (Turkey) ecological conditions. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 38: 313-316.
Seydoşoğlu, S., 2019. Investigation of the effect of fodder peas (Pisum sativum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) herbages mixed at different rates on silage and feed quality. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 56(3):297-302.
Silva, M.S.J., Jobim, C.C., Poppi, E.C., Tres, T.T. and Osmari, M.P., 2015. Production technology and quality of corn silage for feeding dairy cattle in Southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 44(9): 303-313.
Tenikecier, H.S., Ates, E., 2021. Yield, some cell wall component and mineral contents of fodder peas (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L. Poir) forage as influenced by cultivar, growth stages and phosphorus application. Journal of Elementology, 26: 319-332.
Touno, E., Kaneko, M., Uozumi, S., Kawamoto, H., Deguchi, S., 2014. Evaluation of feeding value of forage soybean silage as a substitute for wheat bran in sheep. Animal Science Journal, 85: 46-52.
Turgut, I., Duman, A., Bilgili, U., Acikgoz, E., 2005. Alternate row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 191: 146-151.
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583–3597.
Weiss, B., Underwood, J., 2009. Silage Additives. Ohio State University Extension Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Columbus.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
