The Effect of Male Effect on Some Reproductive Data in Kilis Goats During The Matching Season
Abstract views: 211 / PDF downloads: 126
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10224333Keywords:
Kilis goat, male effect, estrus synchronizationAbstract
Goat breeding is very important for both the livelihood and nutrition of our people, especially those living in mountainous regions. Goat breeding has advantages such as low breeding costs and low veterinary expenses compared to other animal species. The most important disadvantages are seasonal estrus and mating in flocks over a long period of time. In recent years, estrus synchronization and off-season estrus stimulation can be achieved successfully in all seasons of the year with various medical methods. However, increasing costs and labor requirements prevent the widespread use of these methods. The male effect is one of the non-medical methods that are inexpensive and require very little labor. In the presented study, 24 goats were divided into 2 groups and while no treatment was applied to the 1st Group (n:14), the goats of the 2nd Group (n: 10) were kept out of the herd 2-3 months before the breeding season and a male effect was created by joining the herd during the breeding season. Due to the male effect, the mating period was shortened by 46 days and the number of kids produced per parent goat increased by 56% (p> 0.05). As a result of our study, it was concluded that the male effect is beneficial in concentrating the estrus in Kilis goats during the breeding season and that it is an economically beneficial method, although not statistically, in increasing the number of lambs.
References
Abecia, J.A., Forcada, F., González-Bulnes, A., 2012. Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science, 130(3-4): 173-179.
Archunan, G., 2008. Identification of putative pheromones in bovine (bos taurus) faeces in relation to estrus detection. Animal Reproduction Science, 103(1–2): 149–153.
Chemineau, P., 1983. Effect on oestrus and ovulation of exposing creole goats to the male at three times of the year. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 67(1): 65– 72.
Delgadillo, J.A., Gelez, H., Ungerfeld, R., Hawkend, P.A.R., Martin, G.B., 2009. The ‘male effect’ in sheep and goats—Revisiting the dogmas. Behavioural Brain Research, 200: 304–314.
Dominic, C.J., 1991. Chemical communication in animals. Journal of Scientific Research, 41: 157–169.
Doty, R.L., 1976. Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes And Behaviour. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Fatet, A., Pellicer-Rubio, MT., Leboeuf, B., 2011. Reproductive cycle of goats. Animal Reproduction Science, 124(3-4): 211-219.
Günlü, A., Alaşahan, S., 2010. Türkiye’de keçi yetiştiriciliği ve geleceği üzerine bazı değerlendirmeler. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 81(2): 15-20.
Izard, M.K., 1983. Pheromones and reproduction in domestic animals. In: J.G. Vandenberg (Ed), Pheromones and Reproduction in Mammals. Academic Press, New York, pp. 253–285.
Kaçar, C., Kaya, S., Kuru, M., Zonturlu, AK., 2016. Koyun ve keçilerde üremenin denetlenmesinde güncel yöntemler. Turkiye Klinikleri Veterinary Sciences-Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(1): 29-37.
Martin, G.B., Milton, J.T., Davidson, R.H., Banchero-Hunzicker, G.E., Lindsay, D.R., Blanche, D., 2004. Natural methods for increasing reproductive efficiency in small ruminants, Animal Reproduction Science, 82: 231-245.
Neto, A.M.V., Salles, M.G.F., de Araújo, É.P., Rodrigues, I.C.S., da Rocha, D.R., de Araújo, A.A., 2016. Male effect: sustainability and effectiveness in inducing estrus in goat. Journal of Veterinary Andrology, 1(1): 13-23.
Özdemir, F., Keskin, M., 2018. Kilis ve Gaziantep illerinde yetiştirilen Kilis keçilerinin bazı morfolojik ve fizyolojik özellikler bakımından karşılaştırılması. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1): 115-123
Rekwot, P.I., Ogwu, D., Oyedipe, E.O., Sekoni, V.O., 2001. The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction. Animal Reproduction Science, 65(3-4): 157-70.
Şenok, A., Pehlivan, E., Cedden, F., 2021. Effect of buck existence on some reproductive hormone levels during premating in Akkeçi goats. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 45(5): 930-935.
Uçar, M., Özyurtlu, N., 2013. Üremenin denetlenmesi. (Ed. A. Semecan, M. Kaymaz, M. Fındık, A. Rişvanlı, A. Köker). Çiftlik Hayvanlarında Doğum ve Jinekoloji. Medipres Yayıncılık, Malatya, s.549-65.
Walkden-Brown, S.W., Restall, H., Henniawati, H., 1993. The male effect in the Australian cashmere goat 1. Ovarian and behavioural response of seasonally anovulatory does following the introduction of bucks. Animal Reproduction Science, 32: 41–53.
Yılmaz, M., Bardakçıoğlu, H.E., Taşkın, T., 2009. Koç etkisinin kullanımı ve koyun yetiştiriciliği açısından önemi. Hayvansal Üretim, 50(2): 52-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The copyright of the published article belongs to its author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.