Open Access

Roughage Quality of Gelemen Clover (Trifolium meneghinianum Clem.) in Different Development Periods

1 Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Samsun
2 Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Samsun
3 Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Samsun
4 Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Samsun
5 Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Ziraat ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Bilecik

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine some quality characteristics of Gelemen clover (Trifolium meneghinianum Clem.) during budding, flowering and pod setting periods. In the study, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), condensed tannin (KT), total phenolic (TP), total flavonoid (TF), radical scavenging activity (DPPH) contents were determined. The highest CP was in the budding period (17.78%) and the lowest was in the seed setting period (12.29%). The average K, P, Ca and Mg contents of Gelemen clover were 1.75%, 0.38%, 1.18% and 0.28%, respectively. The highest CT was determined in the pod setting period with 1.93%, and the lowest was in the budding period with 1.06%. The average TP, TF, and DPPH contents of the plant during budding, flowering and pod setting periods were 19.08 mg GA g-1, 162.71 mg QE g-1, 162.71 mg QE g-1, and 67.72%, respectively. As a result, the budding and flowering period of showed superior performance compared to the pod setting period in terms of the quality traits. The secondary compounds determined in the plant were sufficient for animal health and nutrition. In addition, the traits identified in the plant will shed light on future studies.

Keywords

How to Cite

KAYMAK BAYRAM, G., CAN, M., ACAR, Z., AYAN, İlknur, & GÜLÜMSER, E. (2023). Roughage Quality of Gelemen Clover (Trifolium meneghinianum Clem.) in Different Development Periods. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(4), 778–783. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10208320

References

📄 Acar, Z., Tan, M., Ayan, İ., Önal Aşçı, Ö., Mut, H., Başaran, U., Gülümser, E., Can, M., Kaymak, G., 2020. Türkiye’de Yem Bitkileri Tarımının Durumu ve Geliştirme Olanakları. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri IX. Teknik Kongresi, Kongre Bildiriler Kitabı, 13-17 Ocak, Ankara.
📄 Arvouet-Grand, A., Vennat, B., Pourrat, A., Legret, P., 1994. Standardisation d`un extrait de propolis et identification desprincipaux constituants. Journal de pharmacie de Belgique, 49: 462-468.
📄 Barry, T.N., 1987. Secondary compounds of forages. In, Hacker JB, Ternouth JH (Eds), Nutrition of Herbivores. Academic Press, Sydney, 91-120.
📄 Bate-Smith, E.C., 1975. Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry, 14(4): 1107-1113.
📄 Cole, E., 2020. Understanding your forage test. (http:// extension.missouri.edu/webster/documents/resources/agriculture/UnderstandingYourForageTest.pdf), (Erişim tarihi: 13.04.2020).