Some Fermentation Characteristics of Silages Made with Sweet Sorghum Bagasse
Abstract views: 302
/ 
PDF downloads: 177
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10748591Keywords:
Sweet sorghum, genotype, fermentation, organic acids, silage, bagasseAbstract
There is a significant need for high-quality hay in our livestock industry. The search for providing alternative quality forage needed by livestock farming continues. The research was carried out to reveal the potential of silages made with sweet sorghum bagasse to be used as roughage. In the research, 21 different sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var. saccharatum (L.) Mohlenbr.) varieties and lines were used as plant materials. Field trials were conducted under second crop conditions in Doğankent/Adana in 2016 and 2017 years. In the research, the plants were harvested to obtain ethanol in the period between the milk and dough formation dates of the grains in the panicle. Some important silage fermentation properties were determined by making silage from sap (bagasse) from which sap was taken. As a result of the research, according to two-year averages, the dry matter (DM) rates of the genotypes were 27.33-37.86%, the ash contents (AC) were 37.0-65.6 g kg-1 DM, and the pH values were 3.019-3.341. In addition, it was determined that the contents of organic acids lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA) and butyric acid (BA) varied between 21.80-46.44, 4.753-11.565, 0.0-2.596 and 0.155-1.513 g kg-1 DM, respectively. According to the results of the research, it was determined that the silages obtained from the sap-taken stems of the sweet sorghum plant have the potential to be used as roughage in terms of fermentation properties. The use of sweet sorghum bagasse, grown as a second product in the Mediterranean region, as silage can be an alternative forage source.
References
Alçiçek, A., Özkan, K., 1997. Silo yemlerinde fiziksel ve kimyasal yöntemlerle silaj kalitesinin saptanması. Türkiye I. Silaj Kongresi, Kongre Bildiriler Kitabı, 16-19 Eylül, Bursa, s. 241-246.
Anonim, 2018a. Deneme alanlarının 2016 ve 2017 yılları toprak analiz sonuçları. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Besleme ve Toprak Bölümü Laboratuvar Analiz Sonuçları. Adana.
Anonim, 2018b. T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı,
Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Adana İl Müdürlüğü, 2016, 2017 Meteorolojik Veriler. (ttps://www.mgm.gov.tr/verideg erlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m =ADANA), (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2018).
Baloch, F.M., Altaf, M.T., Liaqat, W., Bedir, M., Nadeem, M.A., Cömertpay, G., Çoban, N., Habyarimana, E., Barutçular, C., Cerit, I., Ludidi, N., Karaköy, T., Aasim, M., Chung, Y.S., Nawaz, M.A., Hatipoğlu, R., Kökten, K., Sun, H.J., 2023. Recent advancements in the breeding of sorghum crop: current status and future strategies for marker-assisted breeding. Frontiers in Genetics, 14:1150616.
Bolsen, K.K., 1995. Silage: Basic principles. In: Barnes, R.F., Miller, D.A. and Nelson, C.J. (Eds.), Forage Vol. II, The science of grassland agriculture, 5th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp. 163-176
Capstaff, N.M., Miller, A.J., 2018. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 1-18.
Cattani, M., Guzzo, N., Mantovani, R., Bailoni, L., 2017. Effects of total replacement of corn silage with sorghum silage on milk yield, composition, and quality. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 8:15.
Chakravarthi, M.K., Reddy, Y.R., Rao, K.S., Ravi, A., Punyakumari, B., Ekambaram, B., 2017. A study on nutritive value and chemical composition of sorghum fodder. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 6(1): 104-109.
Chen, L., Dong, Z., Li, J., Shao, T., 2019. Ensiling characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation, microbial communities and aerobic stability of low-dry matter silages produced with sweet sorghum and alfalfa mixtures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(5): 2140-2151.
Contreras‐Govea, F.E., Marsalis, M.A., Lauriault, L.M., Bean, B.W., 2010. Forage sorghum nutritive value: A review. Forage & Grazinglands, 8(1): 1-6.
Cruz, S.S.D., Andreotti, M., Pascoaloto, I.M., Lima, G.C.D., Soares, C.D.A., 2020. Production in forage sorghum intercropped with grasses and pigeon pea at crop cutting. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 51(2): e20165389.
Dok, M., Çelik A.E., Aksoy, M., Yücel, C. 2021. Çukurova koşullarında yetiştirilen tatlı sorgum posasından elde edilen peletlerin yanma özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 5(4): 820-832, 2021, 12.12. 2021
Dong, M., Li, Q., Xu, F., Wang, S., Chen, J., Li, W., 2020. Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of sweet sorghum bagasse silage. Scientific Reports, 10: 837.
Durul, G., 2016. Farklı biçim zamanlarının tatlı sorgum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench var. saccharatum) ve fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris) silaj karışımlarında bazı kalite özelliklerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
Emmanuel, S.A., Ibrahim, H.D., Mika, S.R., Alabi, F.M., Olajide, O.O., Sallau, A.A., Adedirin, O., Fadeyi A.E., Akiode S.O., Danlami, U., Orishadipe, A.T., 2022. Nutritional analysis of sweet sorghum stalk as main excipient of compounded dairy and beef cattle feed. Natural Products Chemistry & Research, 10(1): 1-4.
Ferreira, D.J., Zanine, A.M., Santos, E.M., Lana, R.P., Silva, W.L., Souza, A.L., Pereira, O.G., 2011. Perfil fermentativo e valor nutritivo de silagem de capim-elefante inoculada com Streptococcus bovis. Archivos de Zootecnia, 60(232): 1223-1228.
Filya, İ., 2003. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(11): 3575-3581.
Getachew, G., Putnam, D.H., Ben, C.M., De, Peters, E.J., De, De Ben, C.M., De Peters, E.J., 2016. Potential of sorghum as an alternative to corn forage. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 07: 1106-1121.
Gleadow, R.M., Ottman, M.J., Kimball, B.A., Wall, G.W., Pinter, P.J., LaMorte, R.L., Leavitt, S.W., 2016. Drought-induced changes in nitrogen partitioning between cyanide and nitrate in leaves and stems of sorghum grown at elevated CO2 are age dependent. Field Crops Research, 185: 97-102.
Gordon, F.J., Dawson, L.E.R., Ferris, C.P., Steen, R.W.J., Kilpatrick, D.J., 1999. The influence of wilting and forage additive type on the energy utilization of grass silage by growing cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 79: 15-27.
Harper, M.T., Oh, J., Giallongo, F., Lopes, J. C., Roth, G.W., Hristov, A.N., 2017. Using brown midrib 6 dwarf forage sorghum silage and fall-grown oat silage in lactating dairy cow rations. Journal of Dairy Science, 100: 5250-5265.
Junior, M.A.P.O., Retore, M., Manarelli, D.M., de Souza, F.B., Ledesma, L.L.M., Orrico, A.C.A., 2015. Forage potential and silage quality of four varieties of saccharine sorghum. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 50(12): 1201-7.
Kaplan, M., 2013. The effect of variety on the chemical composition and ensiling characteristics of sorghum plant. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 16(2): 34-38.
Kaplan, M., Arslan, M., Kale, H., Kara, K., Kökten, K., 2017. GT biplot analysis for silage potential, nutritive value, gas and methane production of stay-green grain sorghum shoots. Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria, 44(3): 230-238.
Kaya, Ö., Polat, C., 2010. Tekirdağ ili koşullarında I. ve II. ürün olarak yetiştirilen bazı mısır çeşitlerinin silaj fermantasyon özellikleri ve yem değerinin belirlenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3): 129-136.
Kökten, K., Özmen, S., Kaplan, M., 2018. Determination of herbaceous quality features of some sorghum species in Bingöl conditions. EJONS 5. International Congress on Mathematics, Engineering, Natural and Medical Sciences, Conference Proceedings Book, 22-25 November, Gaziantep, pp.129-137.
Kraut, C.J., Tripathi, V., Chen, Y., Gatica, J., Volchinski, V., Sela, S., Weinberg, Z., Cytryn, E., 2016. Temporal and spatial assessment of microbial communities in commercial silages from bunker silos. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100: 6827-6835.
Kumari, N.N., Reddy, Y.R., Blümmel, M., Nagalakshmi, D., Monica, T., 2013. Effect of feeding sweet sorghum bagasse silage with or without chopping on nutrient utilization in deccani sheep. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 13: 243-249.
Kung, J.L., Shaver, R.D., Grant, R.J., Schmidt, R.J., 2018. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5): 4020-4033.
Kung, L., Shaver, R., 2001. Interpretation and use of silage fermentation analysis reports. Focus on Forage, 3(13): 1-5.
Lee, H.S., Coates, G.A., 2000. Quantitative study of free sugars and myoinositol in citrus juices by HPLC and literature compilation. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 14: 2123-2141.
Lema, M., Felix, A., Salako, S., Bishnoi, U., 2000. Nutrient content and in vitro dry matter digestibility of silages made from various grain sorghum and sweet sorghum cultivars, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 17(1): 55-70.
Li, H., Han, X., Liu, H., Hao, J., Jiang, W., Li, S., 2021. Silage Fermentation on sweet sorghum whole plant for fen-flavor Baijiu. Foods, 10: 1477.
Linn, J.G., Martin, N.P., 1999. Forage Quality Tests and Interpretation (Revised 1989). University of Minnesota.
Mahmood, A., Ullah, H., Ijaz, M., Javaid, M.M., Shahzad, A.N., Honermeier, B., 2013. Evaluation of sorghum hybrids for biomass and biogas production. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7(10): 1456-1462.
McDonald, P.J., Henderson, A.R., Heron, S.J. E., 1991. The biochemistry of Silage (2nd ed.), Edinburgh, UK. Mallow Chalcombe Publications.
McDonald, P., Edward, R.A. Greenhalgh, J.F.D., 1995. Animal Nutrition, 5th Edn., Longman Scientific and Technical, England.
Muck, R.E., Moser, L.E., Pitt, R.E. 2003. Postharvest Factors Affecting Ensiling. In: Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E., Harrison, J.H. (Eds.), Silage Science and Technology. Agron. Monogr. 42. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 251-304.
Miron, J., Solomon, R., Adin, G., Nir, U., Nikbachat, M., Yosef, E., Ben-Ghedalia, D., 2006. Effects of harvest stage and re-growth on yield, composition, ensilage and in vitro digestibility of new forage sorghum varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86: 140-147.
Muck, R.E., Moser, L.E., Pitt, R.E., 2003. Postharvest factors affecting ensiling. Pp 251-304 in D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, and J. H. Harrison, eds. Silage Science and Technology. ASA Inc., Madison, WI.
Naeini, S.Z., Khorvash, M., Rowghani, E., Bayat, A., Nikousefat, Z., 2014. Effects of urea and molasses supplementation on chemical composition, protein fractionation and fermentation characteristics of sweet sorghum and bagasse silages as alternative silage crop compared with maize silage in the arid areas. Research Opinions in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 4(6): 343-352.
Neves, A.L.A., Santos, R.D., Pereira, L.G.R., Oliveira, G.F., Scherer, C.B., Verneque, R.S., McAllister, T., 2015. Agronomic characteristics, silage quality, intake and digestibility of five new Brazilian sorghum cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science, 153: 371-380.
Oliveira, N.C., Costa, K.A.P., Rodrigues, L. G., Silva, A.C.G., Costa, J.V.C.P., Silva, S.Á.A, Assis, L.F.A., Oliveira, S.M.P., Vieira, M.L., 2021. Fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of sweet sorghum silage with Paiaguas palisadegrass and Ipypora grass. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 42(3): 1923-1940.
Olusola, F.O., Oluwatosin, O.B., Adebowale, F.N., 2022. Nutritional potentialities of sweet sorghum plant parts in ruminant production system. Archiva Zootechnica, 25(1): 5-23.
Pedersen, J.F., Fritz, J.O., 2000. Forages and fodder In: C. W. Smith and R. A. Frederiksen (eds), Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, 824.
Polan, C.E., Stieve, D., Garrett, J., 1998. Protein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with heat, formic acid, ammonia or microbial inoculant. Journal Dairy Science, 81: 765-76.
Rodrigues, P.H.M., Pinedo, L.A., Meyer, P.M., da Silva, T.H., Guimarães, I.C.D. S.B. 2020. Sorghum silage quality as determined by chemical–nutritional factors. Grass and Forage Science, 75(4): 462-473.
Rodriguez, V.R., Cruz, C.T., Fernendiz, S.J.M., Roldon, C.T., Mendoza, C.A., Saucedo, C.G., Tomasini, C.A. 1999. Use sugarcane bagasse pith as solid substrate for P. chrysosporium growth. Folia Microbiology, 44: 213-218.
TS EN ISO 2171, 2010. Tahıllar, baklagiller ve yan ürünleri - Yakılarak kül muhtevasının tayini. 21 sayfa.
Venkata Seshaiah, Ch., Ramana Reddy, Y., Nagalakshmi, D., Rao, J., 2012. Evaluation of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) bagasse by chemical, in sacco and in vivo techniques in graded murrah buffalo bulls. Journal of Veterinary Advances, 2(8): 418-423.
Ward, R.T., 2000. Fermentation analysis: use and interpretation. In Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference.
Weinberg, Z.G., Ashbell, G., 2003. Engineering aspects of ensiling. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 13: 181-188.
Woolford, M.K., 1984. The silage fermentation. Grassland Research Inst, Hurley, England, p. 350.
Wu-tai, G., Ashbell, G., Hen, Y., Weinberg, Z.G., 2002. The effects of two inoculants applied to forage sorghum at ensiling on silage characteristics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2: 218-221.
Yurtsever, N., 1984. Deneysel İstatistik Metotları. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları Genel Yayın No: 56, Ankara.
Yucel, C., İnal, İ., Yucel, D., Hatipoğlu, R., 2018. Effects of mixture ratio and cutting time on forage yield and silage quality of intercropped berseem clover and Italian ryegrass Legume Research, 41(5): 1-8.
Yucel, C., 2020. Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum Biomass as an Alternative Livestock Feed. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4(1): 10-20.
Yucel, C., Erkan, M.E., 2020. Evaluation of forage yield and silage quality of sweet sorghum in the eastern mediterranean region. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 20(4): 923-930.
Yucel, C., Hatipoglu, R., Bilgin, F.D., İnal, İ., 2023. Bagasse yield and quality traits of silage made from juice extracted sweet sorghum stalks. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 35(4): 379-387.
Yucel, C., Yucel, D., Hatipoglu, R., Dweikat, İ., 2022. Research on the potential of some sweet sorghum genotypes as bioethanol source under Mediterranean conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 46: 141-151.
Yücel, C., Akkaya, M.R., 2022. Mısırın soya ile farklı karışım oranları ve biçim dönemlerinde yapılan silajların fermantasyon özelliklerinin saptanması. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4): 730-742.
Yücel, C., Öktem, A., Gedük, Ş.A., 2021. GAP koşullarında yetiştirilen tatlı sorgumun posası ile yapılan silajın bazı fermantasyon özellikleri. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(4): 1064-1076.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
