Chicken Meat Consumption Habits and Preferences of a State University Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Gevaş Vocational School’s Students


Abstract views: 317 / PDF downloads: 257

Authors

  • Reşit ALDEMİR Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi
  • Ahmet TEKELİ Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü, Van
  • Suna AKKOL Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü, Van

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss4pp985-996

Keywords:

Chicken meat, consumption preferences, university students, Van

Abstract

Chicken meat is an important source of animal protein due to its cheap, high digestibility and biological value. The aim of this study is to determine the viewpoints and consumption habits on chicken meat of Van YYU Gevaş Vocational School’s students. The relationship between students' age (P<0.0001), gender (P = 0.0403), residence status (P<0.0001) and monthly income (P = 0.0126) and chicken meat consumption was found to be statistically significant. As 73.60% of the students consume chicken meat 2-3 times a week, only 4.97% of those who do not consume chicken meat at all. The most preferred part of chicken meat is drumstick with 33.44%, breast with 32.80%, after chicken meat, turkey meat is consumed the most (32.81%), while purchasing, the most attention is paid to the expiry date (54.72%). It is seen that organic chickens are preferred with 45.17% in the store.  In addition, 54.26% of the students stated that chicken doner was preferred in the restaurant, 71.43% of them said that chicken meat was nutritious, 85.09% and 77.95% of the students think that hormone and antibiotics are used, respectively. 77.85% of the students participating in the survey see chicken meat as halal food. 72.78% of the students stated that the poultry farms to be established in Van will affect the consumption of chicken meat positively. The total rate of those who found basmala very important and important in chicken slaughter was found to be quite high (75.75%).  The rate of those who think that GMO is used in chicken feed is 50.83%.

As a result, despite the negative reviews, these positive evaluations of chicken meat are of great importance.  

References

Anonim, 2021. Beyaz et üretimi ve ölçümlerin kontrol altına alınması. https://static-int.testo.com/media/f7/fa/4b4 68b41dd81/beyaz-et-example-application-Food-TR.pdf (Erişim tarihi:15.01.2021)

Bozbay, C.K. 2020. Bir devlet üniversitesindeki (Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi) personel ve öğrenciler arasında farklı etlik piliç barınma ve besleme sistemlerinin tüketici tercihi ve algısı. Türk Tarım–Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8(8): 1643-1649.

Demir, P.A., Aydın, E. 2018. Veteriner Fakültesi öğrencilerinin beyaz et ile yumurta tüketim durumları ve tercihleri. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, 7(1): 563-568.

Dokuzlu, S., Barış, O., Hecer, C., Güldaş, M. 2013. Türkiye’de tavuk eti tüketim alışkanlıkları ve marka tercihleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2): 83-92.

Griffith, C.J., Redmond, E. 2005. Handling poultry and eggs in the kitchen. ın: food safety control in the poultry ındustry. Edited by G C Mead. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, UK and CRC Press, USA. Pp. 524-540.

İskender, H., Kanbay, Y., Özçelik, E. 2015. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin tavuk eti tüketim tercihleri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, 29(1): 09-13.

Kara, M.A., Tekeli, A., Mikail, N. 2020. Üniversite öğrencilerinin tavuk eti tüketim alışkanlıkları: Siirt Üniversitesi örneği, Türkiye. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(3): 327-336.

Karakaya, E., İnci, H. 2014. Bingöl ili merkez ilçesi hane halkının kanatlı eti tüketim tercihleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1): 53-64.

Marangoni, F., Corsello, G., Cricelli, C., Ferrara, N., Ghiselli, A., Lucchin, L., Poli A. 2015. Role of poultry meat in a balanced diet at maintaining health and wellbeing an Italian consensus document. Food and Nutrition Research , 27606 :1-11.

Medeiros, G.C.B.S., Azevedo, K., P., M., Mesquita, G.X.B.M., Lima, S.C.V.C., Silva, D.F.O.S., Pimenta, I.D.S.F., Gonçalves, A.K.S., Lyra, C.O., Piuvezam, G. 2019. Red meat consumtion, risk of incidence of cardiovascular disease an cardiovascular mortality, and the dose-response effect. Medicine, 98:38.

Milicevic, D., Trbovic, D., Petrovic, Z., Strajn, B.J., Nastasijevic, I., Koricanac, V. 2015. Physicochemical and functional properties of chicken meat. Procedia Food Science 5: 191-194.

FAO, STAT, 2021. Livestock Primary. Meat Chicken Production Quantity. Data-2019. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data /QL.(Erişim tarihi:29.01.2021)

OECD-FAO, 2021. Agricultural Output-Meat Consumption-OECD. Data-2019. https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consu mption.htm#indicator-chart (Erişim tarihi:27.01.2021).

Öztürk, E., Güngör, E. 2016. Yumurta ve piliç eti kalitesi-hayvan besleme ilişkisi. Ulusal Kümes Hayvanları Kongresi, 5-8 Ekim, Samsun, s. 299-312.

Parrot, P., Walley, K. 2017. Consumer attitudes to poultry meat: a comparative study of the UK and China. Poultry Quality Evaluation. Elsevier Woodhead Publishing (Edited by Massimilliano Petracci and Cecile Berri). 313-332.

SAS., 2020. SAS/STAT, Version 9.4. Inst. Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

Shruti, S., Hussain, A., Chowdhury, S., Nagarajan, L., Surve, V., Kumar, A., Menezens, E. 2019. Role of poultry meat in human diet. Poultry Punch, April 9.

Yamane, T. 2010. Temel örnekleme yöntemleri, (Çev. Esin A. vd.), Literatür Yayıncılık, Yayın No:53, İstanbul.

Yıldız, A., Duro, A.A. 2019. Etlik piliç yetiştiriciliğinin geliştirilmesi açısından tavuk eti tüketim alışkanlıklarının incelenmesi: Uşak İli Örneği. Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 7(6): 833-839.

Published

2021-12-12

How to Cite

Reşit ALDEMİR, Ahmet TEKELİ, & Suna AKKOL. (2021). Chicken Meat Consumption Habits and Preferences of a State University Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Gevaş Vocational School’s Students . ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(4), 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss4pp985-996

Issue

Section

Articles