Şanlıurfa’da Yaygın Ana Materyaller Üzerinde Oluşan Toprakların Morfolojik, Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özellikleri, Sınıflandırılması ve Adli Uygumalar İçin Değerlendirilmesi

Yüsra İNCİ; Recep GÜNDOĞAN; Ali Volkan  BİLGİLİ; Emrah  RAMAZANOĞLU

doi:10.5281/zenodo.10253621

Authors

Yüsra İNCİ Harran Üniversitesi, Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Gıda Teknolojisi Programı, Şanlıurfa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9740-0013
Recep GÜNDOĞAN Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bölümü ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, Şanlıurfa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-1130
Ali Volkan BİLGİLİ Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bölümü ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, Şanlıurfa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-8283
Emrah RAMAZANOĞLU Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bölümü ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, Şanlıurfa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-5703

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10253621

Keywords:

Forensic use of soils, soil properties, soil classification, Şanlıurfa

Abstract

Soils are one of the important evidences used in forensic applications. However, since the soil is a very variable and dynamic asset, there are some limitations in its use as evidence. In this work, the morphological, physical and chemical properties of the soils formed on the materials commonly found in the province of Şanlıurfa were examined and classified, and their usability for forensic use was evaluated. For this purpose, three soil profiles were defined from the soils formed on four common main materials, soil samples were analyzed and classified according to the horizon. According to the results of the research, soil color, clay accumulation, lime gypsum accumulation, sand, silt, clay rates, classes and sudden texture change, organic matter distribution have been observed. Soil profiles are classified in two ordoes: Inceptisol and Vertisol. Soils with significant soil variations on different main materials; the fact that soil taxonomy does not have sufficient discrimination power that forensic science needs. Therefore, for forensic

References

Altuntaş, G., 2019. Şanlıurfa-Halfeti yöresi topraklarının farklı toprak sınıflandırma sistemlerine göre sınıflandırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Harran Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Şanlıurfa.

Atalay, İ., 2002. Türkiye’nin Ekolojik Bölgeleri. Orman Bakanlığı Yayınları, İzmir.

Bilgili, A.V., Çullu, M.A., Küçük, Ç., Almaca, A., Öztürkmen, A.R., 2015. Harran ovası farklı toprak serilerinde toprak kalite indeksi (skor fonksiyonu) kullanarak toprakların kalitelerinin değerlendirilmesi ve takip edilme potansiyelinin araştırılması. TÜBİTAK TOVAG Proje 111O706, 1-69.

Bouyoucos, G.J., 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of the soil. Agronomy Journal, 43: 434-438.

Cappuyns, V., Swennen, R., Niclaes, M., 2007. Application of the BCR sequential extraction scheme to dredged pond sediments contaminated by Pb–Zn mining: a combined geochemical and mineralogical approach. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 93(2): 78-90.

Ciolkosz, E.J., Dobos, R.R., Waltman, W.J., 1990. The effect of organic carbon, temperature, time, and redox conditions on soil color. Soil Science, 150(2): 506-512.

Çullu, M.A., Aydemir, S., Qadir, M., Almaca, A., Öztürkmen, A.R., Bilgic, A., Ağca, N., 2010. Implication of groundwater fluctuation on the seasonal salt dynamic in the Harran Plain, south‐eastern Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage, 59(4): 465-476.

DSİ, 1972. Harran Ovası Hidrojeolojik Etüt Raporu, Devlet Su işleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.

Dengiz, O., 2010. Morphology, physico-chemical properties and classification of soils on terraces of the Tigris River in the south-east Anatolia region of Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(2010): 205-212.

Dinç, U., Şenol, S., Sayın, M., Kapur, S., Güzel, N., Derici, R., Yeşilsoy, M.Ş., 1988. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Toprakları (GAP), I. Harran Ovası. Şanlıurfa: TÜBİTAK (Proje No: TOAG-534).

Djokic, L., Narancic, T., Biocanin, M., Saljnikov, E., Casey, E., Vasiljevic, B., Nikodinovic-Runic, J., 2013. Phenol removal from four different natural soil types by Bacillus sp. PS11. Applied SoilEecology, 70: 1-8.

Dungait, J.A., Hopkins, D.W., Gregory, A.S., Whitmore, A.P., 2012. Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Global Change Biology, 18(6): 1781-1796.

Fitzpatrick, R.W., Raven, M.D., 2012. How pedology and mineralogy helped solve a double murder case: using forensics to inspire future generations of soil scientists. Soil Horizons, 53(5): 14-29.

Fitzpatrick, R.W., 2008. Nature, distribution and origin of soil materials in the forensic comparison of soils. In: M. Tibbett, D.O. Carter (Eds). Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Biological Effects of Buried Human Remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 1–28.

Foth, H., 1990. Fundamental of Soil Science. Wiley, No: 11, New York.

Gardiner, D.T., Miller, R.W., 2004. Soils in Our Environment. NJ.

Guo, Y., Amundson, R., Gong, P., Ahrens, R., 2003. Taxonomic structure, distribution, and abundance of the soils in the USA. Soil Science. Socity. American Journal, 67: 1507–1516.

Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Toprakları (GAT) I. Harran Ovası, TÜBİTAK, Tarım Ormancılık Araştırma Grubu, Güdümlü Araştırma Projesi Kesin Sonuç Raporu, TAOG, 534.

Gürel, N., 2000. Şanlıurfa İli Yakın Çevresinin Arazi Kullanım Potansiyel Haritası Projesi, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, Ankara.

Ince, D.E., Johnston, C.T., Moudgil, B.M., 1991. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of adsorption of oleic acid/oleate on surfaces of apatite and dolomite. Langmuir, 7(7): 1453-1457.

İnce, F., 1979. Diyarbakır yörensinde yaygın olan bazı büyük toprak gruplarının kil mineralleri ve bunların oluşum nedenleri üzerine bir araştırma. Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.

Jackson, M.L., 1962. Interlayering of expansible layer silicates in soils by chemical weathering. Clays and Clay Minerals, 11(1): 29-46.

Karaca, A., Mert, M., 2012. Toprak fiziğinin kısa bir tarihçesi. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 1(1): 1-46.

Kögel-Knabner, I., 2002. Toprak organik maddesine girdi olarak bitki ve mikrobiyal kalıntıların makromoleküler organik bileşimi. Toprak Biyolojisi ve Biyokimyası, 34(2): 139-162.

MTA, 1996. Inventory of Geothermal Resources. General Directorate of MineralResearch and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey.

Munsell Color, 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1994 Revised Edition. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Instruments, New Windsor, NY.

Nelson, L.M., Yaron, B., Nye, P.H., 1982. Topraktaki parationun biyolojik olarak indüklenen hidrolizi: kinetik ve modelleme. Toprak Biyolojisi ve Biyokimyası, 14(3): 223-227.

Paul, E.A., 2016. The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 98: 109-126.

Pye, K., Croft, D.J., 2004. Forensic geoscience: principles, techniques and applications. Geological Society of London.

Rethemeyer, J., Kramer, C., Gleixner, G., Wiesenberg, G.L., Schwark, L., Andersen, N., Grootes, P.M., 2004. Complexity of soil organic matter: AMS 14 C analysis of soil lipid fractions and individual compounds. Radiocarbon, 46(1): 465-473.

Richards, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. United States Department of Agriculture, Handbook No: 60.

Sakin, E., 2012. Organic carbon organic matter and bulk density relationships in arid semi arid soils in Southeast Anatolia Region. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(6): 1373-1377.

Schwertmann, U., 1993. Relations between iron oxides, soil color, and soil formation. Soil Color, 51-69.

Soil Survey Divison Staff, 1993. Soil Survey Manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC., Handbook No: 18.

Soil Survey Staff, 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 8th edition, USDA/NRCS, Washington.

Soil Survey Staff, 1996. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Rep. 42, Version 2.0, 693-1036.

Soil Survey Staff, 1951. Soil Survey Manual Agriculture. USDA. U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash, Handbook No: 18.

Sugita, R., Marumo, Y., 1996. Validity of color examination for forensic soil identification. Forensic Science International, 83(3): 201-210.

Sumner, M.E., Miller, W.P., 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5: 1201-1229.

Tan, K.H., 1996. Soil Sampling and Analysis. Marcel Dekker. Inc. 270 Madison Avenue. New York. NY. 10016. 191.

Thomas, G.W., 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods Of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5: 475-490.

Woods, B., Kirkbride, K.P., Lennard, C., Robertson, J., 2014. Soil examination for a forensic trace evidence laboratory – Part 2: Elemental analysis Forensic Science International, 245: 195-201.

Yılmaz, K., 1990. Harran ovası topraklarının mineralojik karakterizasyonları, Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.

Zhang, X., Dong, W., Dai, X., Schaeffer, S., Yang, F., Radosevich, M., Sun, X., 2015. Responses of absolute and specific soil enzyme activities to long term additions of organic and mineral fertilizer. Science of the Total Environment, 536: 59-67.

Morphological, Physical and Chemical Characteristics, Classification and Evaluation of Soils Formed on Common Parent Materials in Şanlıurfa for Forensic Applications

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Make a Submission

Language

Keywords